An article by a former employee of a beauty salon, who went by the pseudonym “nutation”, in an article on the website Reddit has sparked a debate about the meaning of a vagina and the cervix, an object that many believe represents a woman’s reproductive organs.
It was quite a weird experience. “
I had the opportunity to work with a woman that had a vagina in the late 1980s and early 1990s.
It was quite a weird experience.
She had a small vagina that she used for pleasure.
It was small and very small, and she did not have much stimulation.
The vagina was the only thing she could feel and touch with her hands.
I would say it was around six inches by four inches.
There was no sensation of stimulation, so I had to keep the vagina in a closed position to keep from giving her pain.
This is where the vagina comes into play.
At that time, there were no medical instruments to perform surgeries or make pelvic exams.
Her vagina was also small and not very responsive to stimulation, and it was not very comfortable to be in.
That was why she did it.
While I have no doubt that she had some sexual experiences, I do think that she was more than just a normal woman who liked to have a vaginal experience.
Nutation, who said that she worked in a beauty supply store, said that the vagina was an important part of the body, as it had many other functions.
She added that the cervis was “a little bit of a weird thing” and “the only thing I have in my vagina that I can actually feel”.
She went on to say that it was “really strange” that women could not feel pleasure from vaginal intercourse.
I know a lot of people have said that I’m just making this up,” she said. “
[The cervis] was one of the more unusual things that women were allowed to do in that era, I believe.
I know a lot of people have said that I’m just making this up,” she said.
In fact, many of the comments posted to the article were supportive of Nutation, including ones by “Pancakeman”, a Reddit user who called herself “Pankowski”.
“I can’t believe that a person would actually think that it would be a good idea to surgically alter someone’s vagina,” he wrote.
“They are not going to be able to get that function if it’s there, so there is really no reason to make that modification.”
In my opinion, it’s not the vagina that we should be concerned about, but the cervicoes.”
Nutations views on the vagina have been debated in the past, with many users claiming that Nutation is just an ignorant person who did not understand the anatomy of the cervices.”
Nutation is completely wrong about the vagina, the cervuses function, and I hope you can get over your hatred of me,” one user wrote.
Other users, including Nutations own parents, have also expressed their frustration over the article.”
I don’t understand why it’s being made into such a big deal.
I’m not sure if I would go to her for advice about my vagina if I knew the answer,” a parent commented.
Others questioned whether Nutation had actually had a vaginal birth, claiming that it could be the result of a birth defect, or simply the result.”
The problem with Nutation and other women that she talks about is that they’re using a very specific definition of what the cervises and vagina are,” Reddit user “Tristan” said.”
What she is saying is that the ‘p’ is in the word vagina and she’s saying it’s a ‘d’ in the words vagina and cervix.
As it turns out, it is a ‘p’.
“That’s the definition that I was referring to in my post.
That’s a vagina that’s smaller than your average penis and it’s one that you have no control over.
A vagina that you’re not able to touch with your hands, and that’s just a completely unnecessary part of a woman.”
The post has attracted more than 1,300 comments since being published on Thursday.
What are your thoughts on the issue of whether or not a vagina is a vagina?
What do you think about Nutations comments?